Minimally Invasive vs. Traditional Surgery for Hip and Knee Replacements

Introduction

When it comes to hip and knee replacement surgeries, the choice between minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and traditional surgery is significant. MIS offers many advantages over traditional approaches, including smaller incisions, less muscle disruption, and quicker recovery times.

Smaller Incisions and Less Muscle Disruption

Traditional joint replacement surgery often involves large incisions and cutting through muscles and tendons. This can lead to increased pain and longer recovery times. Minimally invasive surgery uses much smaller incisions, sparing muscles and tendons. This results in less trauma, less pain, and faster healing.

Better Post-Surgery Recovery

With less tissue damage, patients who undergo MIS typically experience a quicker recovery compared to those who undergo traditional surgery. Most patients report reduced pain, faster mobility, and shorter hospital stays. Read more about Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Advantages of the Subvastus Approach for Knee Replacement

For knee replacement surgery, the subvastus approach spares the quadriceps tendon, which improves patellar tracking and leads to better mobility post-surgery. The subvastus approach also results in fewer complications and a quicker return to activity. Discover more about our Knee Replacement Surgery.

Anterior Approach for Hip Replacement

In hip replacement surgery, the anterior approach spares the major tendons that stabilize the hip, providing better initial stability. This approach allows for the use of real-time imaging during surgery, which helps ensure proper component positioning and further improves outcomes. Learn more about the Anterior Approach for Hip Replacement.

Lower Risk of Complications

The smaller incisions used in MIS reduce the risk of complications such as infection and blood loss. MIS also offers better post-surgery stability due to the preservation of muscles and tendons. Read more about Robotic-Assisted Surgery and how it integrates with MIS to further enhance outcomes.

Conclusion

For patients considering hip or knee replacement, the benefits of minimally invasive surgery are clear. From less pain and faster recovery to fewer complications, MIS provides a superior option compared to traditional surgery. Contact Dr. Trevor Stefanski to learn more about whether minimally invasive surgery is the right choice for you.